Notebook
Articles by Hank Edson
by johnhankedson , 44 pages, 0 comment. Modified on .

ARTICLES BY HANK EDSON
http://hankedson.squarespace.com
Contents (hide)
  1. George Orwellian Bush - MP3
  2. Real Democracy: YouTube Debate, Version 2.0
  3. Even Cowgirls Get the Blues - MP3
  4. Bill's New Book is Giving Me a Headache
  5. We Want Our Humanity Represented! Impeachment for Torture, Now!
  6. The New Feudalism - MP3
  7. Crime and Payment at Exxon-Mobil - MP3
  8. Extraordinary Rendition: Apologies Are Not Enough
  9. New Secret Torture Memos: Nationwide Protest
  10. Overlooking the Obvious On Impeachment - MP3
  11. Extraordinary Rendition: Apologies Are Not Enough - MP3
  12. Bill's New Book Is 'Giving' Me A Headache
  13. Florida 2000 and Al Gore's New Book - MP3 - My Politics and Prog
  14. The Religious Right's Buffet Line - MP3
  15. Edwards/Kucinich 2008?The Gold Standard For Progressive Candidat
  16. Why We Must Leave Iraq ASAP
  17. Why We Must Leave Iraq ASAP
  18. Heartbreak and Duty
  19. What Would Lincoln Do?
  20. In The Name of Sincerity: Politics, Corporations, and... Revolut
  21. The Answer to Bloomberg? Add Free Gore!
  22. America's Crime Against It's Own Humanity
  23. Let's Honk Our Horns As A 'Last Resort'!
  24. Vote Green To Stop The Abuse!
  25. A Bad Character
  26. The False Dilemma Over War Funding
  27. On 9/11 The Question Is What Are We Forgetting - MP3
  28. The Answer to Bloomberg? Add Free Gore! - MP3
  29. America's Crime Against It's Own Humanity - MP3
  30. Let's Honk Our Horns As A 'Last Resort'! - MP3
  31. Vote Green To Stop The Abuse! - MP3
  32. A Bad Character - MP3
  33. The False Dilemma Over War Funding - MP3
  34. Senator Clinton: Change From Within Or More Of The Same? - MP3
  35. Targets In The Electoral College
  36. Third Party Irony
  37. What's It All About, Barack? - MP3
  38. Senator Clinton: Change From Within Or More Of The Same? - MP3
  39. On 9/11 The Question Is What Are We Forgetting
  40. Edwards/Kucinich 2008? The Gold Standard For Progressive Candida
  41. It's Our Democracy, Stupid!
  42. The Bottom Line on the Halliburton Rape Cases
  43. The Neo-Con Foreign Policy of Self-Fulfilling Prophecy
  44. Oprah Good; Pundits Bad
  45. Comments
   Contribute to this notebook
  1. By Hank Edson // MP3, May 3, 2007 -- Nothing better exemplifies the sinister intent of the Republican Alliance toward the people of the United States and the democracy that is theirs than the Alliance's unabashed usage of Orwellian doublespeak. In his landmark distopian novel, 1984, about a world ruled by an authoritarian government, George Orwell foretold a world in which every evil of authoritarian rule was officially labeled it opposite. In the same way, the dehumanizing oppression of the government monitoring and controlling the most intimate details of each individual's life was lovingly referred to as "Big Brother."


    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/george-orwellian-bush/
    1
  2. By Hank Edson // FreePress.org --

    Worthless Currency

    We all know why our presidential debates are worthless currency to the American people.

    We all know that the opinions the candidates will voice are calculated not to offend the contributions made by Big Business on which each candidate's campaign depends.

    We all know that in our 24/7 corporate media culture, the power of the echo-chamber to exaggerate and repeat the slightest deviation from the conventional wisdom completely kills the impulse in the candidate to speak from the heart....

    http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/10/2007/2760
    2
  3. By Hank Edson // MP3, August 21, 2007 -- James Carroll published an insightful column the other day, entitled: "Questions for Hillary Clinton." In his column, Carroll makes the point that like her husband, Hillary has attempted to co-opt the Republican's posture of being "strong" on foreign policy, meaning "dangerously prone to destabilizing violence." My favorite observation from Carroll's column is this one: ...

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/even-cowgirls-get-the-blues/
    3
  4. By HANK EDSON // Counterpunch.org -- Former President Bill Clinton is touring the talk shows selling his new book, Giving, and it's giving me a headache. I don't like the way Clinton co-opts corporate friendly, conservative policy and rhetoric and then brands it as a new form of liberalism. It's as annoying to me as George W. Bush's attempt to co-opt a social conscience from truly progressive proponents of democratic principles. In the case of Clinton's new book, "Giving" just reminds me too much of Bush's "Compassionate Conservatism." Clinton's preaching of the civic duty of philanthropy sounds too much like Bush's "Faith Based Initiative."

    http://www.counterpunch.org/edson09142007.html
    4
  5. By Hank Edson // CommonDreams.org -- There is no shortage of reasons why we should impeach President Bush and Vice-President Cheney. Their crimes are so extensive and so egregious that it is hard to find time to grasp just how deliberate their pursuit has been over the past several years. Today’s topic, torture and how impeachment for torture is necessary to the representation of humanity in our democracy, does not even cover the subset of impeachable offenses: war crimes. By my count, this subset contains six separate impeachable war crimes committed by Bush and Cheney: (1) the supreme war crime of commencing a war of aggression, (2) torture, (3) extraordinary rendition, (4) termination of habeas corpus, (5) inhumane weaponry (such as daisy cutters, depleted uranium shells, and phosphorus bombs), and (6) the usurpation of Iraqi self-determination in economic and political affairs protected under the Geneva Conventions. If every America could take just fifteen minutes to read nine or ten pages telling the story of Bush and Cheney’s willful commitment to torture, it would go far to reorient the mindset in our country that has so passively accepted conduct by our leadership that is absolutely offensive to our values, aspirations, and responsibilities as a democratic people. With hope for such a transformation in our public discourse, I offer this summary of one of the most disgraceful episodes of a disgraceful presidency.

    http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/01/2227/
    5
  6. By Hank Edson // MP3, August 5, 2007 -- Chess is a game that portrays the old power structures of feudal Europe and recognizes the alliance of different authoritarian interests that kept the people of society under the yoke of service to the elite.




    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/the-new-feudalism/
    6
  7. By Hank Edson // MP3, May 17, 2007 -- Let us all take time today to revere one of the icons of corporate monstrosity, Exxon-Mobil. Exxon's business practices are a catalogue of the spiritual crisis crippling the contributions American society was supposed to make to humanity. Rather than peace, prosperity and opportunity, Exxon devotes itself to economic oppression, the war, and the economic devastation of global warming. For Exxon-Mobil, these three crimes against human society are just a matter of basic business practice. Let's take a look at these three business practices and then see just how well Corporate Crime pays:



    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/crime-and-payment-at-exxon-mob/
    7
  8. By Hank Edson // MP3, October 22, 2007

    After Two Years, It's Still Business As Usual

    The Bush administration's determined and diseased compulsion to torture ought to be reason enough to impeach George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, but sadly, it is far from the only reason for taking such politically responsible, humanitarian action. The White House has claimed itself justified in the exercise of a totalitarian brutality that begins with unprovoked shock and awe mass murder of innocent populations, and then swiftly proceeds past torture into the worst nightmares of Joseph Kafka or George Orwell. We are all hopefully aware by now that the depravity of the war on terror extends well beyond heinous torture and involves something the administration refers to as: "extraordinary rendition."

    Extraordinary rendition consists of the seizing of foreign individuals in the midst of their daily lives, refusing them any communication with the outside world, even to spouse or family, and transport ing them to various "black sites" around the world, secret prisons where they are to be beaten, tortured, drugged, and left like brute animals, naked in tiny c ells for months and even years. All this is done, often without the CIA taking even the most minimal efforts to ascertain whether the innocence of the seized individual can be easily and conclusively determined. Unbelievable as all this is, it is not fiction...

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/extraordinary-rendition/
    8
  9. By Hank Edson // MP3, October 4, 2007 -- Just as they say that the one thing that never changes is change itself, the one thing we have learned about the Bush administration is that we always have more to learn.

    Today, The New York Times has published an important article by Scott Shane, David Johnston and James Risen detailing the Bush administration’s still active pursuit of the right to torture, now three years after the passage of the McCain Detainee Treatment Act, which was intended to outlaw what was already twice illegal: torture under the Geneva Conventions ratified by the United States in 1955 and also under the the U.S. War Crimes Act of 1996.
    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/torture-memos/
    9
  10. By Hank Edson // MP3, August 26, 2007

    Does One More Outrage Really Matter?

    It may seem completely unnecessary to pursue yet one more ground for impeachment when we already have so many. In their book, The Case for Impeachment, journalists David Lindorff and Barbara Olshansky have cited, for example, seven classes of impeachable offenses Bush and Cheney have committed:

    1.
    Lying to Congress and America about the need to invade Iraq, about the existence of an imminent threat to the United States, and about the existence of a link between that alleged threat and 9/11.
    2.
    Refusing to cooperate with congressional and 9/11 investigations;
    3.
    Violating the bill of rights by detaining US citizens indefinitely without charge, by detaining and deporting legal residents, and by illegally authorizing the national Security Agency to spy on American citizens without a court order.
    4.
    Abusing power by adding over 1000 signing statements to legislative acts passed by Congress.
    5.
    Obstructing justice in the investigation of the leaking of Valerie Plame’s identity as an undercover CIA operative, and possibly intentionally leaking Plame’s identity as a means of retaliating against Plame’s husband who accused Bush of making false statements in his State of the Union address.
    6.
    Committing criminal negligence in failing to appropriately prepare and respond to Hurricane Katrina.
    7.
    Committing war crimes, including the authorization, use and cover up of the “extraordinary rendition” policy of kidnapping and torture of suspected enemies in violation of the Geneva convention and by committing a “crime against peace” under the Nuremberg Charter by waging a war of aggression.

    Others, such as Elizabeth Holtzman and Elizabeth de la Vega have added additional criminal negligence and war crime offenses, but propose a similar grouping of classes of offenses as do Lindorff and Olshansky. I want to talk about an additional class: Election Theft...
    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/overlooking-the-obvious/
    10
  11. By Hank Edson // MP3, October 22, 2007

    After Two Years, It's Still Business As Usual

    The Bush administration's determined and diseased compulsion to torture ought to be reason enough to impeach George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, but sadly, it is far from the only reason for taking such politically responsible, humanitarian action. The White House has claimed itself justified in the exercise of a totalitarian brutality that begins with unprovoked shock and awe mass murder of innocent populations, and then swiftly proceeds past torture into the worst nightmares of Joseph Kafka or George Orwell. We are all hopefully aware by now that the depravity of the war on terror extends well beyond heinous torture and involves something the administration refers to as: "extraordinary rendition."

    Extraordinary rendition consists of the seizing of foreign individuals in the midst of their daily lives, refusing them any communication with the outside world, even to spouse or family, and transport ing them to various "black sites" around the world, secret prisons where they are to be beaten, tortured, drugged, and left like brute animals, naked in tiny c ells for months and even years. All this is done, often without the CIA taking even the most minimal efforts to ascertain whether the innocence of the seized individual can be easily and conclusively determined. Unbelievable as all this is, it is not fiction...

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/extraordinary-rendition/
    11
  12. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 7, 2007 -- Former President Bill Clinton is touring the talk shows selling his new book, Giving, and it's giving me a headache. I don't like the way Clinton co-opts corporate friendly, conservative policy and rhetoric and then brands it as a new form of liberalism. It's as annoying to me as George W. Bush's attempt to co-opt a social conscience from truly progressive proponents of democratic principles. In the case of Clinton's new book, "Giving" just reminds me too much of Bush's "Compassionate Conservatism." Clinton's preaching of the civic duty of philanthropy sounds too much like Bush's "Faith Based Initiative."

    Don't get me wrong, I'm not against giving. I am not against generosity. And I am not against virtue. It's just that there's something inherently in poor taste about a politician espousing the virtues of "giving" in a society riven by a deep chasm of class and race inequality. It's not just the normal bad taste of a millionaire's self-satisfied self-praise for sharing the crumbs off his table linens with those who are desperate enough to clean them up. In the case of the politician, it's much worse.

    Clinton explains why in his frequent repetition (most recently on Larry King Live) that he was able to do far more good as President of the United States than he will ever be able to do as a private citizen. When a man of Bill Clinton's stature sells a book promoting "giving," he ought to be required to dedicate half the book to making the following argument: If you believe in the spiritual, ethical, and practical necessity of giving, then the most meaningful way to promote that agenda is to be generous in your politics. If you want to be giving, be giving by demanding an aggressively progressive tax code....



    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/bills-new-book/
    12
  13. By Hank Edson // MP3, May 23, 2007 -- The release of Al Gore’s new book, The Assault on Reason, provides an appropriate occasion for a brief revisit to Florida, November 7, 2000, to once again consider the debacle in which the Republican party stole democracy from the America people and then proceeded to claim exclusive right to the American Flag for the next seven years. What better landmark can we find for the commencement of the “assault on reason” than Florida 2000? Going back to that time, I find we still haven’t done all the math necessary to understand as a people key aspects of the assault on democracy we suffered again in 2004, and are vulnerable to experience yet again in 2008.

    To put the math in context, we must first realize that there were several independent strategies the Republican Party used to steal the 2000 election. Here are a few: ....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/florida-2000-and-al-gores-new-/
    13
  14. By Hank Edson // MP3, May 10, 2007 -- One of the key tools used by the Republican Alliance to pursue its essentially anti-democratic agenda is what I call the secretive executive platform. These platforms depend upon being able to fly under the radar of political oversight and they employ a variety of approaches to maintain their secrecy. These different platforms include task forces, advisory boards, alternative intelligence gathering departments, and policy arguments designed to expand the power of the executive branch to the point where it is almost unlimited. Among the various secret executive branch platforms used by the Republican Alliance to pursue the authoritarian, wealth-concentrationist ends are the Defense Policy Board, the Office of Special Plans, and the Policy Counterterrorism Evaluation Group, Vice President Cheney's Energy Task Force, to name a few. In this segment, I will focus on the platform engineered to payback supporters in the Religious Right and to institutionalize the psychological manipulation of false religion within the government in a manner directly contrary to the constitutional doctrine of separation of church and state. We are talking about President Bush's "faith-based initiative."

    President Bush's faith-based initiative provides an executive branch platform through which billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are diverted ultimately for the political purpose of empowering the Religious Right. An estimated $1.7 billion dollars was dolled out in 2003 alone, much of which was directed to key supporters of the Religious Right branch of the Republican Alliance...

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/the-religious-rights-buffet-li/
    14
  15. By Hank Edson //

    http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/04/3597/
    15
  16. By Hank Edson // CommonDreams.org, July 23, 2007 -- It's the Only Way to Fight Our Real Enemy --

    The first awful, horrendous truth is we don’t know our own real enemy. It’s not Al Qaeda, it’s not Saddam Hussein, and it’s not terror. None of these pose a threat to the existence of our democracy. Properly managed, Al Qaeda has far less ability to inflict physical injury on Americans than do Americans who misuse hand guns and automatic weapons. In 2005, handguns killed over 30,000 people in America. Even with these deaths, we do not feel our democracy is in danger.

    The second awful, horrendous truth is that almost all our elected Democratic and Republican leaders incorrectly believe there is no enemy. They do correctly understand that we are not fighting the war in Iraq against an enemy, but rather for a reason-a strategic objective: the control of Middle Eastern oil. But our elected leaders are wrong in thinking there is no enemy.

    The third awful, horrendous truth is that...

    http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/23/2697/
    16
  17. By Hank Edson // The Free Press --

    Hank Edson is an author, activist, and attorney based in San Francisco. ...

    http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/10/2007/2699
    17
  18. By Hank Edson // The Free Press, May 30, 2007 -- I had another post prepared today, but yesterday I read Cindy Sheehan’s letter of resignation as the “face” of the American anti-war movement. I tried to read it aloud to my wife, but I couldn’t do it with composure. Even now alone at my desk, it has the effect of real heartbreak, not heartbreak that just hurts, but heartbreak that cannot maintain its composure — mine, that is, not hers.

    Cindy’s letter stands, as she has always stood, on a clear and honest principle. Her principle used to be “that the issue of peace and people dying for no reason is not a matter of ‘right or left,’ but ‘right and wrong.’” In resigning, her principle has become the principle of all families who have ever watched a loved one’s self-destructive addiction and come to the conclusion that a line must be drawn.

    Cindy writes, “Good-bye America…you are not the country that I love and I finally realize no matter how much I sacrifice, I can’t make you be that country unless you want it. It’s up to you now.”

    One thing is clear to me: There is one truly principled person in our nation, a mother — a mother who lost a son, and who put everything in her life aside to stop the pointless killing being committed by the United States of America in Iraq. She lost her husband for it. She neglected her children and her health for it. She put all her personal resources on the line for it.


    http://www.freepress.org/departments/display/10/2007/2616
    18
  19. By Hank Edson // CommonDreams.org, Tuesday, September 25, 2007 -- "Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh."

    One of the often quoted facts about the American Civil War is that more Americans died in it than died in all the other wars combined. The number of American Civil War dead is estimated at approximately 620,000 people. The President who presided over this carnage we regard as our greatest. Why do you think that is, dear reader? Isn’t it at least a little strange? Before you answer, let me suggest we take a moment to read Lincoln’s own thoughts on this carnage. In his second inaugural address, Lincoln spoke of man’s intentions and man’s relationship to God, in an attempt to puzzle out the meaning of so much terrible death. Referring to both sides of the war, Lincoln reflected:

    "Each looked for an easier triumph, and a result less fundamental and astounding. Both read the same Bible and pray to the same God, and each invokes His aid against the other. It may seem strange that any men should dare to ask a just God's assistance in wringing their bread from the sweat of other men’s faces, but let us judge not, that we be not judged. The prayers of both could not be answered. That of neither has been answered fully. The Almighty has His own purposes. 'Woe unto the world because of offenses; for it must needs be that offenses come, but woe to that man by whom the offense cometh.' If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to Him? Fondly do we hope, fervently do we pray, that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass away. Yet, if God wills that it continue until all the wealth piled by the bondsman’s two hundred and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword, as was said three thousand years ago, so still it must be said 'the judgments of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.'"

    We do well to admire Abraham Lincoln as our finest president, not because he chose war, but because he recognized war as the worst fate a nation could have inflicted upon it....

    http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/25/3989/
    19
  20. By Hank Edson // CommonDreams.org, Thursday, August 30, 2007 -- The Sincerity Question We Don’t Need to Ask

    For the last seven years, we have been asking ourselves, "Does George W. Bush really believe the stuff he says." For example, while campaigning for office, George W. Bush reportedly told a group of supporters in 1999, "I believe God wants me to be president." In July of 2004, he re-asserted this faith, stating, "I trust God speaks through me. Without that, I couldn’t do my job.” When Bob Woodward asked Bush if he asked his father for advice regarding going to war with Iraq, Bush replied: “He is the wrong father to appeal to for advice. The wrong father to go to, to appeal to in terms of strength. There’s a higher Father that I appeal to."

    The sincerity question is beside the point when it comes to George W. Bush, however. Time and again, pundits have essentially defended the President by asserting their opinion that he actually believes that he is a vehicle of God’s will and that his connection with God is a reliable means of directing the course of our nation. The implied logic behind such defenses goes as follows. If Bush believes what he says, then he is not a corrupt and manipulative politician engaging in the worst kind of hypocrisy and abuse of the political process. Instead, he is a legitimate participant in the public debate regarding what is the best course for our democracy. Accordingly, his views must be taken seriously.

    This defense is a distraction from the real issue. ...

    http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/08/30/3504/
    20
  21. By Hank Edson // MP3, June 19, 2007 -- New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is breaking from the Republican Party to make an independent run at the presidency using his own fortune. Bloomberg is the latest act in a political season burgeoning with discontented energy after six plus years of the worst presidency in the history of our nation. First there were all those potential firsts: the first woman president (Hillary), the first black president (Barack), the first Latino (Bill), the first Mormon (Mitt). Then there were those two non-candidates polling high in both the Democratic and Republican Parties: Al Gore and Fred Thompson. And now, there is Bloomberg, the conservative independent. All this energy is good for a system corrupt with corporate campaign finance, there is no doubt, but none of this energy will provide the American people the type of political leadership that can repair the damage that President Bush and Vice President Cheney have wrought.

    All the “firsts”—those candidates dressing up the debate podiums with their carefully centrist, tentatively strident calls for change—are completely wedded to the system of campaign finance that insures their own corruption. This money does not come for free. These candidates want to win and they do not find within themselves any other way to succeed that does not involve accepting the corrupting consequences of corporate cash.

    Al Gore says he’s not getting in the race; Fred Thompson is carefully moving ahead. Bloomberg is looking for a way not to have to be so careful. The problem with Thompson and Bloomberg is that they have devoted themselves to the Republican Party that brought us Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., Gingrich, Delay and Bush Jr. Thompson and Bloomberg are part of a political establishment that has over the last four decades dedicated itself to putting corporate America in charge of our government by pandering to the Religious Right and by crafting a nationalistic foreign policy that institutionalizes an out of control industrial-arms complex. Republicans, even self-made, independent ones, are not acceptable candidates in any shape or form following the disaster that the Republican Party raised to the Presidency in 2000 and 2004. Therefore, the smart money, not the corporate money, has to be invested in Al Gore.

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/the-answer-to-bloomberg-add-fr/
    21
  22. By Hank Edson // MP3, October 2, 2007 -- We are a nation and a culture recklessly out of balance in many more ways than one. I will not count the ways here, but will say that in addition to war, the criminal abuse of our political process by our executive branch, and global warming, we also have our own deep seated racism still twisting our American soul and we must not ignore it in the coming presidential campaign.

    Now, as always, but now more than ever, it is a time when we must try once more to look at our own moral culpability as a society straight on. Lately, reality has been challenging us to do this, but we have been resisting with all the determination of a corporate media intent on discussing O.J. Simpson rather than focus on what happened in Jena. Jena is a challenge for us to look at ourselves more honestly, a challenge to look more thoroughly, more deeply into just how strong our racism remains inside us.

    Jena

    In case you are unfamiliar with what happened in Jena, let me quote to you the story as told by journalist Gary Younge:

    “Fittingly for a post-civil rights story, it began with the discrepancy between what you are allowed to do and what you can do. In August last year, Kenneth Purvis asked the principal at Jena High School if he could sit under the “white tree”–a place in the school courtyard where white students hung out during break. The principal said Purvis could sit where he liked. So the next day he went with his cousin Bryant and stood under the tree. The morning after that three nooses dangled from the tree.”

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/racism-and-jena/
    22
  23. By Hank Edson // MP3,September 29, 2007 -- On March 8, 2003, President Bush gave a presidential radio address discussing his “War on Terror.” A major portion of his address was devoted to his claims that Saddam Hussein was not complying with weapons inspections, was not disarming, and that “he possesses weapons of terror.” He ended his address, saying,

    “We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq. But if Saddam Hussein does not disarm peacefully, he will be disarmed by force. Across the world, and in every part of America, people of goodwill are hoping and praying for peace. Our goal is peace -- for our own nation, for our friends, for our allies and for all the peoples of the Middle East. People of goodwill must also recognize that allowing a dangerous dictator to defy the world and build an arsenal for conquest and mass murder is not peace at all; it is pretense. The cause of peace will be advanced only when the terrorists lose a wealthy patron and protector, and when the dictator is fully and finally disarmed.”

    This echoed a long pattern of claims by the Bush administration that it sought every possible means of avoiding a war. On October 9, 2002, Secretary of State Colin Powell told Larry King, “ War should never be a self-fulfilling prophecy. It should always be a deliberate act by people acting rationally, hopefully. And in this case, as the president said the other night, we are trying to see war as a last resort.” On November 14, 2002, White House Press Secretary told the press that Bush “seeks a peaceful resolution. War is a last resort.” On November 20, 2002, Bush himself repeated his own previous assertions that war with Iraq would be a last resort....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/last-resort/
    23
  24. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 27, 2007 -- The hardest part about abuse in all its forms is that it almost always involves a cycle of repetition magnified through a complex network of co-dependent relationships, wreaking a social havoc that spreads outward in incalculable shudders through the lives of one’s community, as an earthquake shaking city skyscrapers. Such is the case with the largest scale, if not yet the most violent or egregious, case of abuse human beings have ever known, committed, or suffered: global warming. So who are the abused and who are the abusers? What is the community in peril here? Obviously, we are all touched in some way.

    As a spiritual person in a scientific way, believing that there is a conscious intelligence at the quantum foundation of existence where light energy and creative intention combine, I am inclined to think of our planet as a life unto itself as an identity endowed with a sacred right to its own natural cycles, development, and evolution: Gaia.

    Even without embracing the Gaia hypothesis, even without recognizing in the individual plant and mineral existences anything of the universal breath of life, there are still all the human beings and animals who live without participating in our oil-based industrial economy: the innocent ones.

    And of course, there are the rest of us, the classic abusers, heedless of what we are doing even to ourselves.

    We are all going down together unless we get help, unless we help ourselves.

    Most of us don’t like what we’re doing. We may even be trying to address the problem. But like the planet Earth, the entities at issue are bigger than what we normally identify as individually conscious and responsible parties: We are talking about our abusive society, our abusive economy, our abusive industry. We are talking about collective societal abuse and the network of co-dependent relationships existing between individuals within society, the society itself, the international economy, and a whole host of dynamics that at present exert an enormously self-destructive magnetism.

    To break the cycle of abuse, we will find ourselves compelled into a transformation that is healing and powerful on a global scale. We have no other choice. If for no other reason, this combination of being driven to become enlightened is justification for thinking of the consciousness we share in this moment of peril as spiritual in nature: a challenge to free will, a moment of decision, a crossroads clearly marked. This way doom, that way dawn....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/global-warming-1/
    24
  25. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 4, 2007 -- Recent events have me thinking about character. Character is the perennial campaign issue the GOP falls back on whenever their pandering to the wealthy leaves them no other reason to offer the American People for voting Republican. "We may be stealing your last hard earned nickel," they say to us voters, "but at least we have moral strength!" Hunh?

    The False Wall Between Morality and Policy

    It is bad enough that the GOP has so long succeeded in compartmentalizing personal moral character in the public eye as something completely separate from one's positions on policies regarding the social welfare of the vast majority of voters. For years the media has bought hook line and sinker this illegitimate segregation of the private and public spheres.

    As we all know, for example, the talking heads raged over Bill Clinton's betrayal of his marriage as though it were the most condemnable moral turpitude imaginable even though his own wife forgave him. When it comes to George W. Bush’s conduct in creating this war, however, few have come out in the press and held him morally accountable for the more than a million dead, the torture, and the murderous ways of his legally immunized private mercenary forces.

    I know that, in general, as mature human beings, we are supposed to separate the act from the person. We are supposed to condemn the conduct without personalizing our political discourse. The irony here is that the GOP's passion for asserting that “character matters” is specifically aimed at personalizing our political discourse.

    The Republican Party, with its Karl Rove's, its Lee Atwaters, and its Donald Segrettis, lives and dies by the personal smear campaign conducted in the name of "character matters."

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/a-bad-character/
    25
  26. By Hank Edson // MP3 -- Last week General David Petraeus gave his long awaited report on whether President Bush's troop "surge" plan had achieved sufficient success to reverse the opinion of two thirds of Americans who want our troops brought home ASAP. President Bush then gave a national address in which he was expected to lay out a clear strategy for moving ahead in Iraq based on the success of the surge or for pulling out of Iraq based on its failure.

    Of course, what the American people got from the Bush administration was predictable based on past performance. What we got was an artfully vague choreography of political manipulation in which the big picture was hidden from view, a few positive details were exaggerated, change was postponed, and deception was employed by presenting a plan to "reduce" troop levels that merely brought the number of troops in Iraq back to the level they were before the "surge."

    The week was a classic example of how the Bush administration plays politics. The word leadership is never involved. Always, the ball is hit back into someone else's court. Bush calls himself the "decider," but he is really the "returner." When the buck lands on his desk, he instructs a general to return it to Congress. When blame lands on his desk, he instructs his political lieutenants to return it to the "experts" who were hand-picked to tell him what he wanted to hear.

    This time, Bush has passed back to Congress literally the "war buck." The key "check" the legislative branch has against the executive branch concerning the Iraq quagmire is to stop funding the war. Typical of Bush's divisive style of authoritarian leadership, the entire response to the Petraeus report was carefully crafted to force Congress into continuing to fund the President’s stall tactics or else take the blame for any troop casualties resulting from a lack of resources. One after another, the leading Democrats, after pointing out the shameless negligence of Bush's strategy, basically accepted the buck they were being given and legitimized the false dilemma presented to them.

    Democratic Senator Jack Reed said, "The President's speech tonight offers a war without end. It is a PR stunt to buy more time for a stay the course strategy in Iraq that simply hasn't worked….Now they are hostage to the failure of our civilian leadership to present a thoughtful plan to bring them home."

    Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid said, "After almost five years, tonight was just more of the same. It's not progress nor is it the strategy for success our troops deserve. And as long as President Bush keeps them in harm's way without clear purpose or achievable goals, Democrats will keep fighting to responsibly end this war."....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/war-funding/
    26
  27. Less than 3,000 people died on September 11, 2001, the culmination of a criminal conspiracy that was years in the making.

    According to the Center for Disease Control, in 2005, 16,885 people died as a result of alcohol-related car accidents in the United States. Thus, the annual death toll resulting from a culture of alcohol addiction, callous disregard for personal responsibility, and a consumer industry that markets intoxication as happiness is over 5 times the death toll arising from terrorism in the United States in the worst year ever recorded for terrorism in America.

    In 2005, handguns killed over 30,000 people in America. This is 10 times the worst ever annual death toll for terrorism in America. Like the culture of Alcohol, we deliberately sustain a culture of violence and gun-love. The very politicians who have postured for six years over the tragedy of 9/11 take bucket-loads of blood soaked money from the lobby of the National Rifle Association, which irresponsibly resists all efforts to address the carnage. Our politicians talk bravely about capturing Osama bin Laden, but they cower at the prospect of devising realistically sophisticated handgun regulations in accordance with the 2nd Amendment’s requirement that the right to bear arms be "well regulated."....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/September-11-6th-Anniversary/
    27
  28. By Hank Edson // MP3, June 19, 2007 -- New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg is breaking from the Republican Party to make an independent run at the presidency using his own fortune. Bloomberg is the latest act in a political season burgeoning with discontented energy after six plus years of the worst presidency in the history of our nation. First there were all those potential firsts: the first woman president (Hillary), the first black president (Barack), the first Latino (Bill), the first Mormon (Mitt). Then there were those two non-candidates polling high in both the Democratic and Republican Parties: Al Gore and Fred Thompson. And now, there is Bloomberg, the conservative independent. All this energy is good for a system corrupt with corporate campaign finance, there is no doubt, but none of this energy will provide the American people the type of political leadership that can repair the damage that President Bush and Vice President Cheney have wrought.

    All the “firsts”—those candidates dressing up the debate podiums with their carefully centrist, tentatively strident calls for change—are completely wedded to the system of campaign finance that insures their own corruption. This money does not come for free. These candidates want to win and they do not find within themselves any other way to succeed that does not involve accepting the corrupting consequences of corporate cash.

    Al Gore says he’s not getting in the race; Fred Thompson is carefully moving ahead. Bloomberg is looking for a way not to have to be so careful. The problem with Thompson and Bloomberg is that they have devoted themselves to the Republican Party that brought us Nixon, Reagan, Bush Sr., Gingrich, Delay and Bush Jr. Thompson and Bloomberg are part of a political establishment that has over the last four decades dedicated itself to putting corporate America in charge of our government by pandering to the Religious Right and by crafting a nationalistic foreign policy that institutionalizes an out of control industrial-arms complex. Republicans, even self-made, independent ones, are not acceptable candidates in any shape or form following the disaster that the Republican Party raised to the Presidency in 2000 and 2004. Therefore, the smart money, not the corporate money, has to be invested in Al Gore.

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/the-answer-to-bloomberg-add-fr/
    28
  29. By Hank Edson // MP3, October 2, 2007 -- We are a nation and a culture recklessly out of balance in many more ways than one. I will not count the ways here, but will say that in addition to war, the criminal abuse of our political process by our executive branch, and global warming, we also have our own deep seated racism still twisting our American soul and we must not ignore it in the coming presidential campaign.

    Now, as always, but now more than ever, it is a time when we must try once more to look at our own moral culpability as a society straight on. Lately, reality has been challenging us to do this, but we have been resisting with all the determination of a corporate media intent on discussing O.J. Simpson rather than focus on what happened in Jena. Jena is a challenge for us to look at ourselves more honestly, a challenge to look more thoroughly, more deeply into just how strong our racism remains inside us.

    Jena

    In case you are unfamiliar with what happened in Jena, let me quote to you the story as told by journalist Gary Younge:

    “Fittingly for a post-civil rights story, it began with the discrepancy between what you are allowed to do and what you can do. In August last year, Kenneth Purvis asked the principal at Jena High School if he could sit under the “white tree”–a place in the school courtyard where white students hung out during break. The principal said Purvis could sit where he liked. So the next day he went with his cousin Bryant and stood under the tree. The morning after that three nooses dangled from the tree.”

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/racism-and-jena/
    29
  30. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 29, 2007 -- On March 8, 2003, President Bush gave a presidential radio address discussing his “War on Terror.” A major portion of his address was devoted to his claims that Saddam Hussein was not complying with weapons inspections, was not disarming, and that “he possesses weapons of terror.” He ended his address, saying,

    “We are doing everything we can to avoid war in Iraq. But if Saddam Hussein does not disarm peacefully, he will be disarmed by force. Across the world, and in every part of America, people of goodwill are hoping and praying for peace. Our goal is peace -- for our own nation, for our friends, for our allies and for all the peoples of the Middle East. People of goodwill must also recognize that allowing a dangerous dictator to defy the world and build an arsenal for conquest and mass murder is not peace at all; it is pretense. The cause of peace will be advanced only when the terrorists lose a wealthy patron and protector, and when the dictator is fully and finally disarmed.”

    This echoed a long pattern of claims by the Bush administration that it sought every possible means of avoiding a war. On October 9, 2002, Secretary of State Colin Powell told Larry King, “ War should never be a self-fulfilling prophecy. It should always be a deliberate act by people acting rationally, hopefully. And in this case, as the president said the other night, we are trying to see war as a last resort.” On November 14, 2002, White House Press Secretary told the press that Bush “seeks a peaceful resolution. War is a last resort.” On November 20, 2002, Bush himself repeated his own previous assertions that war with Iraq would be a last resort....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/last-resort/
    30
  31. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 27, 2007 -- The hardest part about abuse in all its forms is that it almost always involves a cycle of repetition magnified through a complex network of co-dependent relationships, wreaking a social havoc that spreads outward in incalculable shudders through the lives of one’s community, as an earthquake shaking city skyscrapers. Such is the case with the largest scale, if not yet the most violent or egregious, case of abuse human beings have ever known, committed, or suffered: global warming. So who are the abused and who are the abusers? What is the community in peril here? Obviously, we are all touched in some way.

    As a spiritual person in a scientific way, believing that there is a conscious intelligence at the quantum foundation of existence where light energy and creative intention combine, I am inclined to think of our planet as a life unto itself as an identity endowed with a sacred right to its own natural cycles, development, and evolution: Gaia.

    Even without embracing the Gaia hypothesis, even without recognizing in the individual plant and mineral existences anything of the universal breath of life, there are still all the human beings and animals who live without participating in our oil-based industrial economy: the innocent ones.

    And of course, there are the rest of us, the classic abusers, heedless of what we are doing even to ourselves.

    We are all going down together unless we get help, unless we help ourselves.

    Most of us don’t like what we’re doing. We may even be trying to address the problem. But like the planet Earth, the entities at issue are bigger than what we normally identify as individually conscious and responsible parties: We are talking about our abusive society, our abusive economy, our abusive industry. We are talking about collective societal abuse and the network of co-dependent relationships existing between individuals within society, the society itself, the international economy, and a whole host of dynamics that at present exert an enormously self-destructive magnetism.

    To break the cycle of abuse, we will find ourselves compelled into a transformation that is healing and powerful on a global scale. We have no other choice. If for no other reason, this combination of being driven to become enlightened is justification for thinking of the consciousness we share in this moment of peril as spiritual in nature: a challenge to free will, a moment of decision, a crossroads clearly marked. This way doom, that way dawn....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/global-warming-1/
    31
  32. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 4, 2007 -- Recent events have me thinking about character. Character is the perennial campaign issue the GOP falls back on whenever their pandering to the wealthy leaves them no other reason to offer the American People for voting Republican. "We may be stealing your last hard earned nickel," they say to us voters, "but at least we have moral strength!" Hunh?

    The False Wall Between Morality and Policy

    It is bad enough that the GOP has so long succeeded in compartmentalizing personal moral character in the public eye as something completely separate from one's positions on policies regarding the social welfare of the vast majority of voters. For years the media has bought hook line and sinker this illegitimate segregation of the private and public spheres.

    As we all know, for example, the talking heads raged over Bill Clinton's betrayal of his marriage as though it were the most condemnable moral turpitude imaginable even though his own wife forgave him. When it comes to George W. Bush’s conduct in creating this war, however, few have come out in the press and held him morally accountable for the more than a million dead, the torture, and the murderous ways of his legally immunized private mercenary forces.

    I know that, in general, as mature human beings, we are supposed to separate the act from the person. We are supposed to condemn the conduct without personalizing our political discourse. The irony here is that the GOP's passion for asserting that “character matters” is specifically aimed at personalizing our political discourse.

    The Republican Party, with its Karl Rove's, its Lee Atwaters, and its Donald Segrettis, lives and dies by the personal smear campaign conducted in the name of "character matters."

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/a-bad-character/
    32
  33. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 17, 2007 -- Last week General David Petraeus gave his long awaited report on whether President Bush's troop "surge" plan had achieved sufficient success to reverse the opinion of two thirds of Americans who want our troops brought home ASAP. President Bush then gave a national address in which he was expected to lay out a clear strategy for moving ahead in Iraq based on the success of the surge or for pulling out of Iraq based on its failure.

    Of course, what the American people got from the Bush administration was predictable based on past performance. What we got was an artfully vague choreography of political manipulation in which the big picture was hidden from view, a few positive details were exaggerated, change was postponed, and deception was employed by presenting a plan to "reduce" troop levels that merely brought the number of troops in Iraq back to the level they were before the "surge."

    The week was a classic example of how the Bush administration plays politics. The word leadership is never involved. Always, the ball is hit back into someone else's court. Bush calls himself the "decider," but he is really the "returner." When the buck lands on his desk, he instructs a general to return it to Congress. When blame lands on his desk, he instructs his political lieutenants to return it to the "experts" who were hand-picked to tell him what he wanted to hear.

    This time, Bush has passed back to Congress literally the "war buck." The key "check" the legislative branch has against the executive branch concerning the Iraq quagmire is to stop funding the war. Typical of Bush's divisive style of authoritarian leadership, the entire response to the Petraeus report was carefully crafted to force Congress into continuing to fund the President’s stall tactics or else take the blame for any troop casualties resulting from a lack of resources. One after another, the leading Democrats, after pointing out the shameless negligence of Bush's strategy, basically accepted the buck they were being given and legitimized the false dilemma presented to them.

    Democratic Senator Jack Reed said, "The President's speech tonight offers a war without end. It is a PR stunt to buy more time for a stay the course strategy in Iraq that simply hasn't worked….Now they are hostage to the failure of our civilian leadership to present a thoughtful plan to bring them home."

    Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid said, "After almost five years, tonight was just more of the same. It's not progress nor is it the strategy for success our troops deserve. And as long as President Bush keeps them in harm's way without clear purpose or achievable goals, Democrats will keep fighting to responsibly end this war."....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/war-funding/
    33
  34. Hillary Clinton is the subject of Newsweek’s cover story this week. Newsweek’ s portrait of her is largely flattering describing her as a politician whose life has been committed to making change within the system. In the final question of her interview, Jonathan Darman asks, “What about the biggest difference between Hillary Clinton, the decision maker of today, and Hillary Clinton, the decision maker of 15 years ago? This was Senator Clinton’s response:

    “I have a much deeper understanding of what American leadership at home and abroad has to mean for the 21st century. I am much more experienced in dealing with my own government and understand its potential and its limitations. I believe that my commitment to issues that I care deeply about is just as strong as it was not only 15 years ago, but 35 years ago. My commitment and understanding of the process that has to be pursued in order to make change in America is just much greater than it would have been in the past.”

    With this answer, Clinton is making three points about her candidacy. First, in 15 years she has gained a lot of valuable experience. Second, she has learned from her mistakes that you have to make change happen within the limitations of the system. And third, despite this pragmatic realism, she is still a committed idealist fighting the good fight.

    As far as these three points go, I think they are valid reasons to support Hillary Clinton. But before we jump the gun, there are three other considerations on which our support depends....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/hillary-clinton-2/
    34
  35. By Hank Edson // MP3, June 11, 2007 -- In two recent blog entries, I revisited Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004. That these phrases “Florida in 2000” and “Ohio in 2004” mean something to the American voter indicates that something terrible has happened to our political process. Why do we not say, “America in 2000 and 2004”? Why is the story of the first and second Bush Jr. presidencies, essentially the story of only a single state? The answer is that our political process has been targeted for short circuiting at its weakest link. To understand how this is possible, the American voter must have a basic understanding of the political process circuitry our Constitution has created for electing the president of the United States. This circuitry is called the electoral college.

    The electoral college was originally conceived as a device to protect the interests of “small states” (states with low populations) by preventing regional and rural electoral majorities from being completely washed out by the election results of larger, more populous states. This is how the system was intended to work:

    In the electoral college system, each state is accorded a number of electoral votes proportionate to its share of the American population, but each state’s electoral votes are an all-or-nothing proposition. The candidate who wins the majority in each state wins all that state’s electoral college votes. The result is that the popular vote is ultimately irrelevant in determining who becomes president of the United States. Instead, what matters is which candidate wins the majority of electoral college votes....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/campaign-issue-electoral-colle/
    35
  36. By Hank Edson // MP3, July 29, 2007 -- Ralph Nader was right, sort of. He did say, after all, that Democratic Party politicians had no reason to listen to the voters on the left whose vote they regarded as “in the bank.” Well, they are not listening.

    Roughly 70% of democrat voters now favor impeachment, but the democrats in the House of Representatives aren’t budging. We want our troops home, but the “surge” continues. As a result of the Democrat’s betrayal of their mid-term victory, the woman in charge, Nancy Pelosi, is being challenged for her seat by Cindy Sheehan as an independent.

    It may be different to run a third party campaign for president than to run one against the Speaker of the House of Representatives, but this distinction should not drown out the obvious truth: we cannot rely on the lesser evil as a solution for the greater one.

    Somewhere Ralph Nader is buying a Sheehan for Congress t-shirt with, “I told you so,” written on the back....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/thirdpartyirony/
    36
  37. By Hank Edson // MP3, October 9, 2007 -- Is it just me, or has America already gotten tired of the 2008 presidential campaign, more than a year before the actual election? Has the corporate media winded itself in its frenzied impulse to hype meaningless content 24/7? Why does it seem in early October 2007 that the 2008 campaign has already come and gone, complete with YouTube presidential debates, “fundraising primaries,” and book tour after book tour? In the eerie emptiness of campaign news, we have a moment of contemplation available in which to reflect upon the strange Twilight Zone of historical moments in which we presently find ourselves.


    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/obama1/
    37
  38. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 13, 2007 -- Hillary Clinton is the subject of Newsweek's cover story this week. Newsweek's portrait of her is largely flattering describing her as a politician whose life has been committed to making change within the system. In the final question of her interview, Jonathan Darman asks, "What about the biggest difference between Hillary Clinton, the decision maker of today, and Hillary Clinton, the decision maker of 15 years ago?" This was Senator Clinton’s response:

    "I have a much deeper understanding of what American leadership at home and abroad has to mean for the 21st century. I am much more experienced in dealing with my own government and understand its potential and its limitations. I believe that my commitment to issues that I care deeply about is just as strong as it was not only 15 years ago, but 35 years ago. My commitment and understanding of the process that has to be pursued in order to make change in America is just much greater than it would have been in the past."

    With this answer, Clinton is making three points about her candidacy. First, in 15 years she has gained a lot of valuable experience. Second, she has learned from her mistakes that you have to make change happen within the limitations of the system. And third, despite this pragmatic realism, she is still a committed idealist fighting the good fight.

    As far as these three points go, I think they are valid reasons to support Hillary Clinton. But before we jump the gun, there are three other considerations on which our support depends....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/hillary-clinton-2/
    38
  39. By Hank Edson // MP3, September 11, 2007 -- Less than 3,000 people died on September 11, 2001, the culmination of a criminal conspiracy that was years in the making.

    According to the Center for Disease Control, in 2005, 16,885 people died as a result of alcohol-related car accidents in the United States. Thus, the annual death toll resulting from a culture of alcohol addiction, callous disregard for personal responsibility, and a consumer industry that markets intoxication as happiness is over 5 times the death toll arising from terrorism in the United States in the worst year ever recorded for terrorism in America.

    In 2005, handguns killed over 30,000 people in America. This is 10 times the worst ever annual death toll for terrorism in America. Like the culture of Alcohol, we deliberately sustain a culture of violence and gun-love. The very politicians who have postured for six years over the tragedy of 9/11 take bucket-loads of blood soaked money from the lobby of the National Rifle Association, which irresponsibly resists all efforts to address the carnage. Our politicians talk bravely about capturing Osama bin Laden, but they cower at the prospect of devising realistically sophisticated handgun regulations in accordance with the 2nd Amendment’s requirement that the right to bear arms be "well regulated."....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/September-11-6th-Anniversary/
    39
  40. By Hank Edson // CommonDreams.org, September 4, 2007 -- Last week, CommonDreams published an article I wrote, which was in part about a speech made by John Edwards. In the speech in question, Edwards set forth the rule by which I think all candidates for the presidency should be judged: Are they anti-corporate power or are they corporate owned?

    I titled my piece, “ Edwards, Does He Mean It?,” but CommonDreams gave it a new title, which better suited the full scope of my discussion. Without its original title, however, many readers interpreted my discussion to be an endorsement of John Edwards. In fact, it was meant as a challenge: “You have spoken bold words, Mr. Edwards; now, show us that you really mean them.”

    Thanks to reader participation in CommonDreams-type forums, we all learn a tremendous amount about the process of public discourse. One thing the response to my column clearly revealed to me is the frustration and resentment many people feel over the media’s neglect of candidates like Dennis Kucinich, Mike Ravel, and Ron Paul.

    What I saw as an opportunity to challenge John Edwards to further commit himself to a truly progressive agenda, some supporters of Kucinich saw as yet another example of the media neglecting the candidate who truly possesses a solid record of progressive leadership....

    http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/09/04/3597/
    40


  41. Why the Progressive Movement
    Needs to Unite Behind John Edward



    By Hank Edson

    Last August I proposed in two sequential opinion pieces that perhaps John Edwards was the man progressives should rally around in order to have the most beneficial impact on our direction as a nation. (See Edwards, Does He Mean It and Edwards/Kucinich 2008? ) At that time, however, we were still months away from the primaries and many readers were not persuaded by my argument. I am hoping that following this weekend’s New Hampshire democratic presidential campaign debate, the time may now be ripe for an organized effort to demonstrate unified progressive endorsement of John Edwards for President of the United States.

    Saturday night saw four democratic candidates at the debate podiums: John Edwards, Barack Obama, Bill Richardson, and Hillary Clinton, from left to right across the TV screen. Each candidate urged the voters to apply a different standard in selecting who should be President. Roughly put, the candidates made the following claims:

    Edwards argued that what mattered was whether the candidate had a personal commitment to reclaiming for the people the power stolen by corporate special interests.

    Obama argued what mattered was whether the candidate could rally the American people to support an agenda for change.

    Richardson argued what mattered was whether the candidate had the independence and experience required to build effective political coalitions for getting things done.

    Clinton argued that what mattered was whether the candidate had a record of actually making change happen.

    Here’s why we all need to get behind the Edwards campaign today with an unprecedented demonstration of energy and organization as a progressive movement:...

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/edwards3/
    41


  42. The facts are despicable, criminal, worse than animal, just absolutely ugly. In 2005, 20-year-old Jamie Leigh Jones of Houston, Texas had just signed on to work in Iraq for a Halliburton subsidiary, Kellogg, Brown, and Root (KBR), one of the private military contractors most used by the United States military. Just two days after arriving in Iraq to begin her job, a group of several of her American co-workers drugged her, gang raped her, and left her naked to wake up bleeding and in pain, still groggy from the drugs she had been slipped. Jones writes that she would eventually need surgery because “my attackers tore my pectoral muscles due to the brutality of the attack.”

    When she got back from the Army doctors who told her she had been repeatedly raped “both vaginally and anally,” however, Halliburton/KBR’s immediate response was to place Jones under guard inside a shipping container where she was held for over 24 hours without food or water. KBR officials warned her that if she left Iraq for medical treatment, “There won’t be a position here, and there won’t be a position in Houston.” Jones had to be rescued from the container by a State Department official from the Iraq U.S. Embassy, which only happened because one of Jones’ guards had pity on her and lent her a cell phone to call her father, who then contacted his congressman, who then contacted the State Department.

    After two years of seeking justice for the crimes committed against her, Jones has been forced to file a civil suit because the justice department claims it can’t prosecute private military contractors in Iraq...


    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/halliburton-rape-1/
    42


  43. Yet Again: Why We Must Impeach President Bush and Vice President Cheney

    By Hank Edson

    A Time for Humble Pie

    On Tuesday, President Bush reported to the nation and the world that a recent National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) concluded that four years ago Iran had stopped its covert program aimed at developing nuclear weapons. To many sober minds, this news would be cause not only for a little celebration, but also a little humble pie.

    After all, over the past several months, the President and other senior members of his administration have depicted Iran over the last several months as bent upon acquiring nuclear weapons. As recently as October, President Bush said in a press conference, “ I think so long -- until they suspend and/or make it clear that they -- that their statements aren't real, yeah, I believe they want to have the capacity, the knowledge, in order to make a nuclear weapon. And I know it's in the world's interest to prevent them from doing so.” [i] Two years ago, U.S. intelligence reported that Iran was “determined to develop nuclear weapons” and the President’s statements have projected this image ever since. Now that new information has come to light, instead of adjusting his tone to reflect his errors, the President is pushing ahead as recklessly as ever before....

    http://hankedson.squarespace.com/self-fulfilling-prophecy/
    43
  44. By Hank Edson

    With the writer’s strike in play, the nation has been badly missing its nightly dose of John Stewart, especially when it comes to those clips showing a series of one pundit after another banally repeating the same talking points with overwrought intensity. What has particularly been driving me crazy these past few days is hearing over and over again one pundit after another saying they don’t think Oprah Winfrey will have that much impact on the presidential campaign and that she might be getting in over her head.

    What the pundits don’t get about Oprah is that she is like MoveOn.org and Ross Perot: She is an available high capacity vehicle for the people’s political energy in a time when the political process is completely clogged up by corruption and our government is utterly dysfunctional. It’s not about Oprah’s impact. And she doesn’t have to pass any “gotcha” question test. All Oprah has to do is offer the people a compellingly powerful platform they recognize as also having more integrity than they find in the charade that has become our election process.

    http://thedemocraticdaily.com/2007/12/02/oprah-good-pundits-bad/
    44
link to this notebook:
Want to create notebooks for yourself, your organization or business? Visit iLeonardo.com.
Comments
No comment yet.
Want to contribute to this notebook?

Suggest a link Become a contributor

Similar Notebooks to
Articles by Hank Edson

Most Viewed Notebooks
  (last 7 days)

Latest Notebooks

Facebook (11) by josh

More notebooks...